Canada – If Jane Philpott Does Not Have Confidence In Justin Trudeau, Why Should Anyone Else?

If Jane Philpott doesn’t have confidence in Justin Trudeau, why should anyone else?

If your stomach can handle it, spend a few minutes listening to the interview Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland gave to CBC’s Ottawa Morning last week, the day after Jody Wilson-Raybould testified before the House of Commons justice committee.

Wilson-Raybould, you’ll recall, spent the previous afternoon meticulously filleting the prime minister’s credibility on the SNC-Lavalin file, calling the pressure on her to seek a remediation agreement for the company in its criminal case “consistent and sustained.” Wilson-Raybould manoeuvred the knife like a Michelin-star chef, placing Justin Trudeau at the centre of the alleged influence campaign.

That’s why it was so off-putting to listen to Freeland, speaking to radio host Robyn Bresnahan the next morning, slobbering over the bones Wilson-Raybould had left behind when she exited the committee room last Wednesday.

“Of course I support the prime minister 100 per cent,” Freeland said, adding she was “clearly of the view that the prime minister would never apply improper pressure.”

That was despite what the former attorney general described in assiduous detail the day prior.

Freeland lauded the decision for Trudeau to waive solicitor-client privilege and cabinet confidentiality as an “exercise in democracy.” (Though it was only a partial waiver, which ostensibly should make it only a partial exercise in democracy.) And she dodged the question of whether she believed Wilson-Raybould’s testimony, saying: “I believe that she spoke — as she said she wanted to do — her truth.”

During nearly four hours of testimony last week, Wilson-Raybould said the pressure exerted on her in regards to SNC-Lavalin was ‘consistent and sustained.’ (Chris Wattie/Reuters)

You have to listen to the interview to appreciate the full effect, but suffice to say, it was the sort of sycophantic performance characteristic of — and perfected in — the early days of #TeamTrudeau. Freeland didn’t just pledge her allegiance to the prime minister (which, granted, you sort of have to do as a cabinet member), she actually extolled his handling of the affair — as if the conflicting messages, sloppy smear jobs and clumsy attempts at obfuscation never happened.

Freeland was gushing over a plate of bones, trying to convince us they still looked tasty.

Contrast that with the statement released by Philpott on Monday, when she announced her resignation as president of the Treasury Board and exit from cabinet.

Philpott said she had “lost confidence in how the government has dealt with this matter and in how it has responded to the issues raised.” Citing the need for cabinet solidarity, she said it would be “untenable” for her to continue to serve as a minister.

A million more Freeland-type ovations can’t undo what Philpott did in a few hundred words: she told the doe-eyed #TeamTrudeau hangers-on that their faith in this government is misplaced. And she said she would not be able to fulfil her duties as a minister if it meant publicly defending the government.

That’s a devastating message from her especially; Philpott is capable, venerable and widely respected both in and out of Liberal circles. She can’t be written off as a cabinet minister disgruntled about a demotion or an opposition leader out for blood. Philpott is a Liberal — a widely admired one — and she doesn’t have faith in the prime minister.

And if she doesn’t, as someone privy to the conversations around the cabinet table about this whole affair, why should anyone else? – Robyn Urback · CBC News

read full article here

What I remember about Freeland is how she was draped all over Saudi Rahaf Mohammed al-Qunun when she arrived in Toronto. It was a sickening performance.

I believe Freeland sees herself replacing Trudeau one day.  Scary thought.  She is a Russophobe.  Someone you do not want running your country in this warmongering global climate.

Freeland ‘very sad’ about Philpott resignation over SNC-Lavalin affair, defends Trudeau as ‘feminist’

But is he a feminist?  Really?  Or is he a feminist when its to his benefit to be a feminist and the rest of the time, he is a “my way or the highway” type of boss?

Why should we have confidence in any cabinet minister who has not yet resigned?  Patty Hadju, what are you waiting for?  Time to stand side by side with your political sisters. Do the right thing and resign from cabinet.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

enter code *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.