One Response

  1. world-citizen
    world-citizen at | | Reply

    It seems the hotelier can’t be named until ownership of the land is transferred. Why wasn’t the land offered as a 99 year lease? Why did such important land have to be sold?

    Perhaps a condition of sale is the construction of a hotel? Perhaps no sale because that obligation can’t be met, in other words, how “everything is in place” can things really be. And we have been told everything is in place for a long time.

    I notice the CJ, which has given this project the benefit of every reasonable doubt and more, is also beginning to get frustrated.

    One way or the other, looks like we are down to the end of the wire here.

Leave a Reply

enter code *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.